03-21-2018, 10:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2018, 10:53 AM by tommiehansen.)
(03-21-2018, 05:54 AM)timvang Wrote: I just downloaded and tested the March 18th version. It ran much faster than the old version as expected. However, the simulated profit from the new version was always less than the one from the old version for every backtest I ran. I wonder if anyone is getting the same result?
Yes, i've seen that too. The problem is that tulip rsi and native rsi differs. This can be seen pretty easily since the both the ADX and the regular version comes with a logger that logs min/max that can be setup to show that stuff after a run.
Which of the one is more correct then the other is a different question though.