Hey guys,
I posted in discord but realised that it might get lost of hijacked easily so I created a thread here.
I just cloned stable branch, installed production dependencies and npm installed talib and tulind.
After that, I ran the default MACD, Tulip-MACD and Talib-MACD. All of them with default settings over the exact same dataset.
To my surprise, all 3 of them returned different results. And they arent even close to each other.
Im wondering if anyone faces the same issue (it would help if you could do a quick test. After all, they are all build in strategies with default params).
And if there is a solution to this. Because its going to be difficult to build an accurate strategy if 3 supposedly identical indicators provides different results.
Attached are the results from each:
MACD
macd.png (Size: 57.43 KB / Downloads: 15)
TULIP MACD
tulip-macd.png (Size: 57.05 KB / Downloads: 10)
TALIB MACD
talib-macd.png (Size: 57.14 KB / Downloads: 12)
I posted in discord but realised that it might get lost of hijacked easily so I created a thread here.
I just cloned stable branch, installed production dependencies and npm installed talib and tulind.
After that, I ran the default MACD, Tulip-MACD and Talib-MACD. All of them with default settings over the exact same dataset.
To my surprise, all 3 of them returned different results. And they arent even close to each other.
Im wondering if anyone faces the same issue (it would help if you could do a quick test. After all, they are all build in strategies with default params).
And if there is a solution to this. Because its going to be difficult to build an accurate strategy if 3 supposedly identical indicators provides different results.
Attached are the results from each:
MACD
macd.png (Size: 57.43 KB / Downloads: 15)
TULIP MACD
tulip-macd.png (Size: 57.05 KB / Downloads: 10)
TALIB MACD
talib-macd.png (Size: 57.14 KB / Downloads: 12)